Skip to main content

Banora Point vs Holsworthy

Property investment comparison - Banora Point, NSW 2486 vs Holsworthy, NSW 2173

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Banora Point wins 4, Holsworthy wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBanora PointHolsworthy
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$890K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.16%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)4.52%3.84%
1-year house growth+6.7%estimate+6.3%
3-year house growth-+25.2%
Vacancy rate1.0%2.4%
Population16,4605,657

Banora Point vs Holsworthy: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Banora Point and $1.3M in Holsworthy.

On cash flow, Banora Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.16%, compared with 3.20% in Holsworthy, a gap of 0.96 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.7% in Banora Point (an estimate) and +6.3% in Holsworthy, so recent momentum favours Banora Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Banora Point and 2.4% in Holsworthy, so landlords in Banora Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Banora Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,460 against 5,657, roughly 2.9 times the size of Holsworthy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Banora Point for rental income, Banora Point for recent price momentum, Banora Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison