Skip to main content

Barden Ridge vs Mortdale

Property investment comparison - Barden Ridge, NSW 2234 vs Mortdale, NSW 2223

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barden Ridge wins 0, Mortdale wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBarden RidgeMortdale
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$1.4M$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.55%
Gross rental yield (units)3.97%4.25%
1-year house growth+6.5%+7.2%estimate
3-year house growth+18.0%-
Vacancy rate6.1%0.9%
Population4,12910,745

Barden Ridge vs Mortdale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Barden Ridge and $1.9M in Mortdale, so Mortdale is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Barden Ridge sits at a median of $1.4M against $815K in Mortdale, which makes Mortdale the more affordable unit market and Barden Ridge the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.5% in Barden Ridge and +7.2% in Mortdale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Mortdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Mortdale and 6.1% in Barden Ridge, so landlords in Mortdale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mortdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,745 against 4,129, roughly 2.6 times the size of Barden Ridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mortdale for a lower purchase price, Mortdale for recent price momentum, Mortdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison