Bardwell Park vs Dalwood
Property investment comparison - Bardwell Park, NSW 2207 vs Dalwood, NSW 2335
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bardwell Park wins 2, Dalwood wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bardwell Park | Dalwood |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.2M | $2.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $555K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.26% | 1.88% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.31% | 5.70% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +2.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Population | 2,320 | 111 |
Bardwell Park vs Dalwood: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.2M in Bardwell Park and $2.2M in Dalwood, so Bardwell Park is the cheaper entry point, with Dalwood houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Bardwell Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.26%, compared with 1.88% in Dalwood, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Dalwood and 1.9% in Bardwell Park, so landlords in Dalwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bardwell Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,320 against 111, roughly 21 times the size of Dalwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bardwell Park for rental income, Bardwell Park for a lower purchase price, Dalwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison