Skip to main content

Bardwell Park vs Stanwell Park

Property investment comparison - Bardwell Park, NSW 2207 vs Stanwell Park, NSW 2508

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bardwell Park wins 3, Stanwell Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBardwell ParkStanwell Park
Median house price$2.2M$2.2M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.26%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.31%3.51%
1-year house growth+7.7%+9.4%estimate
3-year house growth+2.6%-
Vacancy rate1.9%2.5%
Population2,3201,532

Bardwell Park vs Stanwell Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Bardwell Park and $2.2M in Stanwell Park, so Bardwell Park is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Bardwell Park and +9.4% in Stanwell Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Stanwell Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Bardwell Park and 2.5% in Stanwell Park, so landlords in Bardwell Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bardwell Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,320 against 1,532, larger than Stanwell Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bardwell Park for a lower purchase price, Stanwell Park for recent price momentum, Bardwell Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison