Skip to main content

Bardwell Park vs Wombarra

Property investment comparison - Bardwell Park, NSW 2207 vs Wombarra, NSW 2515

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bardwell Park wins 2, Wombarra wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBardwell ParkWombarra
Median house price$2.2M$2.2M
Median unit price-$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.26%2.47%
Gross rental yield (units)4.31%4.54%
1-year house growth+7.7%+0.2%estimate
3-year house growth+2.6%-
Vacancy rate1.9%1.3%
Population2,320944

Bardwell Park vs Wombarra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Bardwell Park and $2.2M in Wombarra, so Bardwell Park is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Wombarra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.47%, compared with 2.26% in Bardwell Park, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Bardwell Park and +0.2% in Wombarra (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bardwell Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Wombarra and 1.9% in Bardwell Park, so landlords in Wombarra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bardwell Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,320 against 944, roughly 2.5 times the size of Wombarra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wombarra for rental income, Bardwell Park for a lower purchase price, Bardwell Park for recent price momentum, Wombarra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison