Skip to main content

Bardwell Valley vs Campsie

Property investment comparison - Bardwell Valley, NSW 2207 vs Campsie, NSW 2194

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bardwell Valley wins 2, Campsie wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBardwell ValleyCampsie
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$1.3M$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.12%
Gross rental yield (units)2.59%4.59%
1-year house growth+9.4%+8.9%estimate
3-year house growth+19.2%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.3%
Population2,34426,132

Bardwell Valley vs Campsie: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Bardwell Valley and $2.1M in Campsie, so Bardwell Valley is the cheaper entry point, with Campsie houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bardwell Valley sits at a median of $1.3M against $690K in Campsie, which makes Campsie the more affordable unit market and Bardwell Valley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.4% in Bardwell Valley and +8.9% in Campsie (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bardwell Valley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Campsie and 1.6% in Bardwell Valley, so landlords in Campsie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Campsie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 26,132 against 2,344, roughly 11 times the size of Bardwell Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bardwell Valley for a lower purchase price, Bardwell Valley for recent price momentum, Campsie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison