Skip to main content

Bardwell Valley vs Miranda

Property investment comparison - Bardwell Valley, NSW 2207 vs Miranda, NSW 2228

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bardwell Valley wins 1, Miranda wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBardwell ValleyMiranda
Median house price$2.1M$2.0M
Median unit price$1.3M$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.56%
Gross rental yield (units)2.59%4.39%
1-year house growth+9.4%+4.4%
3-year house growth+19.2%+19.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.9%
Population2,34417,942

Bardwell Valley vs Miranda: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Bardwell Valley and $2.0M in Miranda, so Miranda is the cheaper entry point, with Bardwell Valley houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bardwell Valley sits at a median of $1.3M against $840K in Miranda, which makes Miranda the more affordable unit market and Bardwell Valley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.4% in Bardwell Valley and +4.4% in Miranda, so recent momentum favours Bardwell Valley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Miranda and 1.6% in Bardwell Valley, so landlords in Miranda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Miranda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,942 against 2,344, roughly 8 times the size of Bardwell Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Miranda for a lower purchase price, Bardwell Valley for recent price momentum, Miranda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison