Barfold vs Clarinda
Property investment comparison - Barfold, VIC 3444 vs Clarinda, VIC 3169
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barfold wins 1, Clarinda wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Barfold | Clarinda |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $730K | $825K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.22% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.39% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | -3.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +10.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.8% | 1.1% |
| Population | 82 | 7,441 |
Barfold vs Clarinda: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Barfold and $1.1M in Clarinda, so Clarinda is the cheaper entry point, with Barfold houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Barfold sits at a median of $730K against $825K in Clarinda, which makes Barfold the more affordable unit market and Clarinda the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Clarinda and 2.8% in Barfold, so landlords in Clarinda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Clarinda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,441 against 82, roughly 91 times the size of Barfold; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Clarinda for a lower purchase price, Clarinda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison