Skip to main content

Bargo vs Jamisontown

Property investment comparison - Bargo, NSW 2574 vs Jamisontown, NSW 2750

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bargo wins 1, Jamisontown wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBargoJamisontown
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.08%3.27%
Gross rental yield (units)4.32%4.35%
1-year house growth+8.2%+10.0%estimate
3-year house growth+22.3%-
Vacancy rate0.9%1.1%
Population4,5165,321

Bargo vs Jamisontown: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Bargo and $1.1M in Jamisontown.

On cash flow, Jamisontown leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.27%, compared with 3.08% in Bargo, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Bargo and +10.0% in Jamisontown (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Jamisontown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Bargo and 1.1% in Jamisontown, so landlords in Bargo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Jamisontown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,321 against 4,516, larger than Bargo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Jamisontown for rental income, Jamisontown for recent price momentum, Bargo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison