Skip to main content

Barraba vs Terry Hie Hie

Property investment comparison - Barraba, NSW 2347 vs Terry Hie Hie, NSW 2400

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barraba wins 2, Terry Hie Hie wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBarrabaTerry Hie Hie
Median house price$300K$305K
Median unit price$480K$190K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.90%8.65%
Gross rental yield (units)2.42%8.89%
1-year house growth+16.7%-
3-year house growth+23.4%-
Vacancy rate0.6%1.7%
Population1,32976

Barraba vs Terry Hie Hie: what the numbers say

The median house price is $300K in Barraba and $305K in Terry Hie Hie, so Barraba is the cheaper entry point, with Terry Hie Hie houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Barraba sits at a median of $480K against $190K in Terry Hie Hie, which makes Terry Hie Hie the more affordable unit market and Barraba the pricier one.

On cash flow, Terry Hie Hie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 8.65%, compared with 5.90% in Barraba, a gap of 2.75 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Barraba and 1.7% in Terry Hie Hie, so landlords in Barraba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Barraba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,329 against 76, roughly 17 times the size of Terry Hie Hie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Terry Hie Hie for rental income, Barraba for a lower purchase price, Barraba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison