Skip to main content

Barrack Heights vs Whalan

Property investment comparison - Barrack Heights, NSW 2528 vs Whalan, NSW 2770

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barrack Heights wins 2, Whalan wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBarrack HeightsWhalan
Median house price$930K$930K
Median unit price-$465K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.02%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%4.95%
1-year house growth+7.1%estimate+9.1%
3-year house growth-+34.6%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.1%
Population6,0035,929

Barrack Heights vs Whalan: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $930K in Barrack Heights and $930K in Whalan.

On cash flow, Barrack Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.02% in Whalan, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.1% in Barrack Heights (an estimate) and +9.1% in Whalan, so recent momentum favours Whalan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Barrack Heights and 1.1% in Whalan, so landlords in Barrack Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Barrack Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,003 against 5,929, larger than Whalan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Barrack Heights for rental income, Whalan for recent price momentum, Barrack Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison