Barragup vs Bayswater
Property investment comparison - Barragup, WA 6209 vs Bayswater, WA 6053
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barragup wins 3, Bayswater wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Barragup | Bayswater |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $370K | $600K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.35% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.30% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.0%estimate | +22.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +66.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Population | 940 | 15,288 |
Barragup vs Bayswater: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Barragup and $1.2M in Bayswater, so Barragup is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Barragup sits at a median of $370K against $600K in Bayswater, which makes Barragup the more affordable unit market and Bayswater the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.0% in Barragup (an estimate) and +22.6% in Bayswater, so recent momentum favours Bayswater, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.7%.
Bayswater is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,288 against 940, roughly 16 times the size of Barragup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Barragup for a lower purchase price, Bayswater for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison