Skip to main content

Baskerville vs North Beach

Property investment comparison - Baskerville, WA 6056 vs North Beach, WA 6020

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Baskerville wins 0, North Beach wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBaskervilleNorth Beach
Median house price$2.2M$2.1M
Median unit price$790K-
Gross rental yield (houses)1.49%2.30%
Gross rental yield (units)4.57%4.70%
1-year house growth+16.1%+21.3%estimate
3-year house growth+27.7%-
Vacancy rate3.5%0.8%
Population3023,689

Baskerville vs North Beach: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Baskerville and $2.1M in North Beach, so North Beach is the cheaper entry point, with Baskerville houses about 7% dearer.

On cash flow, North Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.30%, compared with 1.49% in Baskerville, a gap of 0.81 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.1% in Baskerville and +21.3% in North Beach (an estimate), so recent momentum favours North Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in North Beach and 3.5% in Baskerville, so landlords in North Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,689 against 302, roughly 12 times the size of Baskerville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: North Beach for rental income, North Beach for a lower purchase price, North Beach for recent price momentum, North Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison