Skip to main content

Bateman vs Coogee

Property investment comparison - Bateman, WA 6150 vs Coogee, WA 6166

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bateman wins 2, Coogee wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBatemanCoogee
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price-$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.87%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.78%
1-year house growth+19.4%estimate+18.2%
3-year house growth-+43.9%
Vacancy rate2.0%0.8%
Population3,8325,345

Bateman vs Coogee: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Bateman and $1.6M in Coogee, so Bateman is the cheaper entry point, with Coogee houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Coogee leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 2.87% in Bateman, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.4% in Bateman (an estimate) and +18.2% in Coogee, so recent momentum favours Bateman, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Coogee and 2.0% in Bateman, so landlords in Coogee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Coogee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,345 against 3,832, larger than Bateman; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coogee for rental income, Bateman for a lower purchase price, Bateman for recent price momentum, Coogee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison