Battery Hill vs St Mary
Property investment comparison - Battery Hill, QLD 4551 vs St Mary, QLD 4650
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Battery Hill wins 0, St Mary wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Battery Hill | St Mary |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $710K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.31% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +19.0%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Population | 2,596 | 34 |
Battery Hill vs St Mary: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Battery Hill and $1.3M in St Mary, so St Mary is the cheaper entry point.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in St Mary and 1.6% in Battery Hill, so landlords in St Mary face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Battery Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,596 against 34, roughly 76 times the size of St Mary; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: St Mary for a lower purchase price, St Mary for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison