Skip to main content

Bauple vs Hyde Park

Property investment comparison - Bauple, QLD 4650 vs Hyde Park, QLD 4812

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bauple wins 1, Hyde Park wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBaupleHyde Park
Median house price$650K$650K
Median unit price$425K$410K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.06%4.47%
Gross rental yield (units)5.12%5.60%
1-year house growth+12.8%+7.4%estimate
3-year house growth+50.8%-
Vacancy rate1.0%0.7%
Population7451,374

Bauple vs Hyde Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $650K in Bauple and $650K in Hyde Park.

For units, Bauple sits at a median of $425K against $410K in Hyde Park, which makes Hyde Park the more affordable unit market and Bauple the pricier one.

On cash flow, Hyde Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.47%, compared with 4.06% in Bauple, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.8% in Bauple and +7.4% in Hyde Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bauple, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Hyde Park and 1.0% in Bauple, so landlords in Hyde Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hyde Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,374 against 745, larger than Bauple; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hyde Park for rental income, Bauple for recent price momentum, Hyde Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison