Bawley Point vs Cobbitty
Property investment comparison - Bawley Point, NSW 2539 vs Cobbitty, NSW 2570
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bawley Point wins 1, Cobbitty wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bawley Point | Cobbitty |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $685K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.10% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.68% |
| 1-year house growth | +3.9%estimate | +11.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 3.9% |
| Population | 844 | 4,206 |
Bawley Point vs Cobbitty: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Bawley Point and $1.3M in Cobbitty.
Over the past year house prices moved +3.9% in Bawley Point (an estimate) and +11.5% in Cobbitty (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cobbitty, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Bawley Point and 3.9% in Cobbitty, so landlords in Bawley Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Cobbitty is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,206 against 844, roughly 5.0 times the size of Bawley Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cobbitty for recent price momentum, Bawley Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison