Skip to main content

Bawley Point vs Liverpool

Property investment comparison - Bawley Point, NSW 2539 vs Liverpool, NSW 2170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bawley Point wins 2, Liverpool wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBawley PointLiverpool
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$685K$535K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.65%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.58%
1-year house growth+3.9%estimate+10.3%
3-year house growth-+23.9%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.3%
Population84431,078

Bawley Point vs Liverpool: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Bawley Point and $1.3M in Liverpool, so Bawley Point is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Bawley Point sits at a median of $685K against $535K in Liverpool, which makes Liverpool the more affordable unit market and Bawley Point the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.9% in Bawley Point (an estimate) and +10.3% in Liverpool, so recent momentum favours Liverpool, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Bawley Point and 1.3% in Liverpool, so landlords in Bawley Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Liverpool is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,078 against 844, roughly 37 times the size of Bawley Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bawley Point for a lower purchase price, Liverpool for recent price momentum, Bawley Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Bawley Point vs Liverpool: Suburb Comparison 2026