Baynton vs Denmark
Property investment comparison - Baynton, WA 6714 vs Denmark, WA 6333
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Baynton wins 0, Denmark wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Baynton | Denmark |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $840K | $840K |
| Median unit price | $675K | $295K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.54% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.7% | +19.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +25.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 0.3% |
| Population | 4,496 | 2,691 |
Baynton vs Denmark: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Baynton and $840K in Denmark.
For units, Baynton sits at a median of $675K against $295K in Denmark, which makes Denmark the more affordable unit market and Baynton the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Baynton and +19.3% in Denmark (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Denmark, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Denmark and 0.7% in Baynton, so landlords in Denmark face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Baynton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,496 against 2,691, larger than Denmark; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Denmark for recent price momentum, Denmark for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison