Skip to main content

Baynton vs Waikiki

Property investment comparison - Baynton, WA 6714 vs Waikiki, WA 6169

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Baynton wins 1, Waikiki wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayntonWaikiki
Median house price$840K$840K
Median unit price$675K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+11.7%+20.1%estimate
3-year house growth+25.4%-
Vacancy rate0.7%2.1%
Population4,49612,453

Baynton vs Waikiki: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Baynton and $840K in Waikiki.

For units, Baynton sits at a median of $675K against $620K in Waikiki, which makes Waikiki the more affordable unit market and Baynton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Baynton and +20.1% in Waikiki (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Waikiki, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Baynton and 2.1% in Waikiki, so landlords in Baynton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Waikiki is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,453 against 4,496, roughly 2.8 times the size of Baynton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Waikiki for recent price momentum, Baynton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison