Skip to main content

Baynton vs Wellard

Property investment comparison - Baynton, WA 6714 vs Wellard, WA 6170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Baynton wins 1, Wellard wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayntonWellard
Median house price$840K$840K
Median unit price$675K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.54%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+11.7%+20.4%
3-year house growth+25.4%+75.6%
Vacancy rate0.7%2.0%
Population4,49614,127

Baynton vs Wellard: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Baynton and $840K in Wellard.

For units, Baynton sits at a median of $675K against $585K in Wellard, which makes Wellard the more affordable unit market and Baynton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Baynton and +20.4% in Wellard, so recent momentum favours Wellard, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Baynton houses are +25.4% and Wellard houses +75.6%, so Wellard has compounded faster than Baynton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Baynton and 2.0% in Wellard, so landlords in Baynton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wellard is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,127 against 4,496, roughly 3.1 times the size of Baynton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wellard for recent price momentum, Baynton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison