Bayswater vs Fairbridge
Property investment comparison - Bayswater, WA 6053 vs Fairbridge, WA 6208
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bayswater wins 2, Fairbridge wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bayswater | Fairbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $600K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.35% | 2.73% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.30% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +22.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +66.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 2.2% |
| Population | 15,288 | 55 |
Bayswater vs Fairbridge: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Bayswater and $1.2M in Fairbridge, so Fairbridge is the cheaper entry point, with Bayswater houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Bayswater leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.35%, compared with 2.73% in Fairbridge, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Bayswater and 2.2% in Fairbridge, so landlords in Bayswater face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bayswater is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,288 against 55, roughly 278 times the size of Fairbridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bayswater for rental income, Fairbridge for a lower purchase price, Bayswater for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison