Skip to main content

Bayswater vs Ludlow

Property investment comparison - Bayswater, WA 6053 vs Ludlow, WA 6280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bayswater wins 1, Ludlow wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayswaterLudlow
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$600K$505K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.35%3.56%
Gross rental yield (units)5.30%7.68%
1-year house growth+22.6%-
3-year house growth+66.2%-
Vacancy rate0.7%0.7%
Population15,288132

Bayswater vs Ludlow: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Bayswater and $1.2M in Ludlow, so Bayswater is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Bayswater sits at a median of $600K against $505K in Ludlow, which makes Ludlow the more affordable unit market and Bayswater the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ludlow leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.56%, compared with 3.35% in Bayswater, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Ludlow and 0.7% in Bayswater, so landlords in Ludlow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bayswater is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,288 against 132, roughly 116 times the size of Ludlow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ludlow for rental income, Bayswater for a lower purchase price, Ludlow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Bayswater vs Ludlow: Property Investment Comparison (2026)