Skip to main content

Bayview vs Naremburn

Property investment comparison - Bayview, NSW 2104 vs Naremburn, NSW 2065

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bayview wins 1, Naremburn wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayviewNaremburn
Median house price$3.2M$3.2M
Median unit price$3.4M$1.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.73%-
Gross rental yield (units)-3.27%
1-year house growth-9.6%+1.3%
3-year house growth-5.7%+3.5%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.1%
Population3,8075,924

Bayview vs Naremburn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.2M in Bayview and $3.2M in Naremburn, so Bayview is the cheaper entry point, with Naremburn houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bayview sits at a median of $3.4M against $1.4M in Naremburn, which makes Naremburn the more affordable unit market and Bayview the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -9.6% in Bayview and +1.3% in Naremburn, so recent momentum favours Naremburn, while Bayview went backwards.

Looking back three years, Bayview houses are -5.7% and Naremburn houses +3.5%, so Naremburn has compounded faster than Bayview over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Naremburn and 1.4% in Bayview, so landlords in Naremburn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Naremburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,924 against 3,807, larger than Bayview; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bayview for a lower purchase price, Naremburn for recent price momentum, Naremburn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison