Skip to main content

Beaconsfield vs Gatton

Property investment comparison - Beaconsfield, QLD 4740 vs Gatton, QLD 4343

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beaconsfield wins 2, Gatton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeaconsfieldGatton
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price-$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.20%4.17%
Gross rental yield (units)5.68%4.51%
1-year house growth+9.4%+15.8%
3-year house growth+62.1%+73.5%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.6%
Population5,8997,851

Beaconsfield vs Gatton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Beaconsfield and $730K in Gatton.

On cash flow, Beaconsfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.20%, compared with 4.17% in Gatton, a gap of 1.03 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.4% in Beaconsfield and +15.8% in Gatton, so recent momentum favours Gatton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Beaconsfield houses are +62.1% and Gatton houses +73.5%, so Gatton has compounded faster than Beaconsfield over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Gatton and 1.6% in Beaconsfield, so landlords in Gatton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gatton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,851 against 5,899, larger than Beaconsfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beaconsfield for rental income, Gatton for recent price momentum, Gatton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison