Skip to main content

Beaconsfield vs North Toowoomba

Property investment comparison - Beaconsfield, QLD 4740 vs North Toowoomba, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beaconsfield wins 3, North Toowoomba wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeaconsfieldNorth Toowoomba
Median house price$730K$735K
Median unit price-$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.20%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.68%4.00%
1-year house growth+9.4%+9.5%
3-year house growth+62.1%+60.7%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.6%
Population5,8993,332

Beaconsfield vs North Toowoomba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $730K in Beaconsfield and $735K in North Toowoomba, so Beaconsfield is the cheaper entry point, with North Toowoomba houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.4% in Beaconsfield and +9.5% in North Toowoomba, so recent momentum favours North Toowoomba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Beaconsfield houses are +62.1% and North Toowoomba houses +60.7%, so Beaconsfield has compounded faster than North Toowoomba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in North Toowoomba and 1.6% in Beaconsfield, so landlords in North Toowoomba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beaconsfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,899 against 3,332, larger than North Toowoomba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beaconsfield for a lower purchase price, North Toowoomba for recent price momentum, North Toowoomba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison