Skip to main content

Beecroft vs North Ryde

Property investment comparison - Beecroft, NSW 2119 vs North Ryde, NSW 2113

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beecroft wins 2, North Ryde wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeecroftNorth Ryde
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$1.0M$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.50%
1-year house growth-3.8%+3.5%
3-year house growth+1.1%+7.3%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.9%
Population10,29114,043

Beecroft vs North Ryde: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Beecroft and $2.6M in North Ryde, so Beecroft is the cheaper entry point, with North Ryde houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Beecroft sits at a median of $1.0M against $820K in North Ryde, which makes North Ryde the more affordable unit market and Beecroft the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -3.8% in Beecroft and +3.5% in North Ryde, so recent momentum favours North Ryde, while Beecroft went backwards.

Looking back three years, Beecroft houses are +1.1% and North Ryde houses +7.3%, so North Ryde has compounded faster than Beecroft over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.9%.

North Ryde is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,043 against 10,291, larger than Beecroft; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beecroft for a lower purchase price, North Ryde for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison