Belivah vs Ningi
Property investment comparison - Belivah, QLD 4207 vs Ningi, QLD 4511
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Belivah wins 2, Ningi wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Belivah | Ningi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $990K | $990K |
| Median unit price | $1.1M | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.67% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.95% | 2.90% |
| 1-year house growth | +20.6%estimate | +16.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +45.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.3% | 0.5% |
| Population | 515 | 5,349 |
Belivah vs Ningi: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $990K in Belivah and $990K in Ningi.
Over the past year house prices moved +20.6% in Belivah (an estimate) and +16.8% in Ningi, so recent momentum favours Belivah, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Ningi and 2.3% in Belivah, so landlords in Ningi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ningi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,349 against 515, roughly 10 times the size of Belivah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Belivah for recent price momentum, Ningi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison