Skip to main content

Bellambi vs Cudgen

Property investment comparison - Bellambi, NSW 2518 vs Cudgen, NSW 2487

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellambi wins 2, Cudgen wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellambiCudgen
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$660K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.09%4.92%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+9.4%estimate+7.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.6%3.4%
Population4,039952

Bellambi vs Cudgen: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Bellambi and $1.3M in Cudgen, so Cudgen is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Cudgen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.92%, compared with 3.09% in Bellambi, a gap of 1.83 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.4% in Bellambi (an estimate) and +7.2% in Cudgen (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bellambi, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bellambi and 3.4% in Cudgen, so landlords in Bellambi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bellambi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,039 against 952, roughly 4.2 times the size of Cudgen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cudgen for rental income, Cudgen for a lower purchase price, Bellambi for recent price momentum, Bellambi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison