Skip to main content

Bellbird Heights vs Tarro

Property investment comparison - Bellbird Heights, NSW 2325 vs Tarro, NSW 2322

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellbird Heights wins 3, Tarro wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellbird HeightsTarro
Median house price$750K$750K
Median unit price$475K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)5.56%5.05%
1-year house growth+12.0%estimate+11.1%
3-year house growth-+25.5%
Vacancy rate1.5%2.8%
Population8051,703

Bellbird Heights vs Tarro: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Bellbird Heights and $750K in Tarro.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Bellbird Heights (an estimate) and +11.1% in Tarro, so recent momentum favours Bellbird Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Bellbird Heights and 2.8% in Tarro, so landlords in Bellbird Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tarro is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,703 against 805, roughly 2.1 times the size of Bellbird Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellbird Heights for recent price momentum, Bellbird Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison