Skip to main content

Bellbird vs Orange

Property investment comparison - Bellbird, NSW 2325 vs Orange, NSW 2800

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellbird wins 3, Orange wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellbirdOrange
Median house price$750K$750K
Median unit price-$505K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.50%4.19%
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%4.98%
1-year house growth+20.0%+9.9%
3-year house growth+39.9%+0.6%
Vacancy rate5.0%1.1%
Population2,33841,232

Bellbird vs Orange: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Bellbird and $750K in Orange.

On cash flow, Bellbird leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 4.19% in Orange, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.0% in Bellbird and +9.9% in Orange, so recent momentum favours Bellbird, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bellbird houses are +39.9% and Orange houses +0.6%, so Bellbird has compounded faster than Orange over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Orange and 5.0% in Bellbird, so landlords in Orange face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Orange is the bigger suburb, with a population of 41,232 against 2,338, roughly 18 times the size of Bellbird; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellbird for rental income, Bellbird for recent price momentum, Orange for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison