Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Collinswood

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Collinswood, SA 5081

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 3, Collinswood wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsCollinswood
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price-$645K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%2.52%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%3.97%
1-year house growth+15.9%+9.0%
3-year house growth+35.0%+21.9%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.8%
Population2,7121,496

Bellevue Heights vs Collinswood: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Bellevue Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 2.52% in Collinswood, a gap of 0.48 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +9.0% in Collinswood, so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bellevue Heights houses are +35.0% and Collinswood houses +21.9%, so Bellevue Heights has compounded faster than Collinswood over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Collinswood and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Collinswood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bellevue Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,712 against 1,496, larger than Collinswood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for rental income, Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, Collinswood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison