Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Glandore

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Glandore, SA 5037

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Glandore wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsGlandore
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price-$760K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%3.34%
1-year house growth+15.9%+8.8%
3-year house growth+35.0%+38.8%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.3%
Population2,7123,041

Bellevue Heights vs Glandore: what the numbers say

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.00% in Bellevue Heights and 3.00% in Glandore, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +8.8% in Glandore, so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bellevue Heights houses are +35.0% and Glandore houses +38.8%, so Glandore has compounded faster than Bellevue Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Glandore and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Glandore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glandore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,041 against 2,712, larger than Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, Glandore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison