Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Hope Valley

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Hope Valley, SA 5090

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Hope Valley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsHope Valley
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price-$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%4.27%
1-year house growth+15.9%+11.7%
3-year house growth+35.0%+37.5%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.9%
Population2,7128,184

Bellevue Heights vs Hope Valley: what the numbers say

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +11.7% in Hope Valley, so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bellevue Heights houses are +35.0% and Hope Valley houses +37.5%, so Hope Valley has compounded faster than Bellevue Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Hope Valley and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Hope Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hope Valley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,184 against 2,712, roughly 3.0 times the size of Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, Hope Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison