Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Port Noarlunga

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Port Noarlunga, SA 5167

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Port Noarlunga wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsPort Noarlunga
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price-$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%3.46%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%4.42%
1-year house growth+15.9%+12.8%estimate
3-year house growth+35.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.2%
Population2,7123,245

Bellevue Heights vs Port Noarlunga: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Port Noarlunga leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.46%, compared with 3.00% in Bellevue Heights, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +12.8% in Port Noarlunga (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Port Noarlunga and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Port Noarlunga face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Port Noarlunga is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,245 against 2,712, larger than Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Port Noarlunga for rental income, Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, Port Noarlunga for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison