Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Salisbury Downs

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Salisbury Downs, SA 5108

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Salisbury Downs wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsSalisbury Downs
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price-$220K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%3.84%
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%6.31%
1-year house growth+15.9%+15.5%estimate
3-year house growth+35.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%0.8%
Population2,7126,296

Bellevue Heights vs Salisbury Downs: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Salisbury Downs leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.84%, compared with 3.00% in Bellevue Heights, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +15.5% in Salisbury Downs (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Salisbury Downs and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Salisbury Downs face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Salisbury Downs is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,296 against 2,712, roughly 2.3 times the size of Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Salisbury Downs for rental income, Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, Salisbury Downs for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison