Skip to main content

Benalla vs Cobram

Property investment comparison - Benalla, VIC 3673 vs Cobram, VIC 3644

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Benalla wins 2, Cobram wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBenallaCobram
Median house price$445K$440K
Median unit price$315K$330K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.87%5.66%
Gross rental yield (units)3.31%5.52%
1-year house growth--3.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.0%1.3%
Population10,8226,148

Benalla vs Cobram: what the numbers say

The median house price is $445K in Benalla and $440K in Cobram, so Cobram is the cheaper entry point, with Benalla houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Benalla sits at a median of $315K against $330K in Cobram, which makes Benalla the more affordable unit market and Cobram the pricier one.

On cash flow, Benalla leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.87%, compared with 5.66% in Cobram, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Cobram and 3.0% in Benalla, so landlords in Cobram face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Benalla is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,822 against 6,148, larger than Cobram; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Benalla for rental income, Cobram for a lower purchase price, Cobram for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison