Benambra vs Nhill
Property investment comparison - Benambra, VIC 3900 vs Nhill, VIC 3418
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Benambra wins 3, Nhill wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Benambra | Nhill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $265K | $280K |
| Median unit price | $295K | $375K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 6.64% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 7.04% | 2.40% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +17.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.1% |
| Population | 173 | 2,401 |
Benambra vs Nhill: what the numbers say
The median house price is $265K in Benambra and $280K in Nhill, so Benambra is the cheaper entry point, with Nhill houses about 6% dearer.
For units, Benambra sits at a median of $295K against $375K in Nhill, which makes Benambra the more affordable unit market and Nhill the pricier one.
Nhill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,401 against 173, roughly 14 times the size of Benambra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Benambra for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison