Bendoc vs Murchison
Property investment comparison - Bendoc, VIC 3888 vs Murchison, VIC 3610
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bendoc wins 2, Murchison wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bendoc | Murchison |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $430K | $425K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.72% | 5.29% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 7.79% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 3.7% |
| Population | 109 | 884 |
Bendoc vs Murchison: what the numbers say
The median house price is $430K in Bendoc and $425K in Murchison, so Murchison is the cheaper entry point, with Bendoc houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Bendoc leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.72%, compared with 5.29% in Murchison, a gap of 0.43 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Bendoc and 3.7% in Murchison, so landlords in Bendoc face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Murchison is the bigger suburb, with a population of 884 against 109, roughly 8 times the size of Bendoc; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bendoc for rental income, Murchison for a lower purchase price, Bendoc for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison