Bentley Park vs Edmonton
Property investment comparison - Bentley Park, QLD 4869 vs Edmonton, QLD 4869
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bentley Park wins 0, Edmonton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bentley Park | Edmonton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $750K | $750K |
| Median unit price | - | $375K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.91% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 6.30% |
| 1-year house growth | +16.9% | +16.9% |
| 3-year house growth | +51.3% | +55.9% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 0.9% |
| Population | 8,360 | 11,409 |
Bentley Park vs Edmonton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Bentley Park and $750K in Edmonton.
Over the past year house prices moved +16.9% in both suburbs.
Looking back three years, Bentley Park houses are +51.3% and Edmonton houses +55.9%, so Edmonton has compounded faster than Bentley Park over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Edmonton and 1.8% in Bentley Park, so landlords in Edmonton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Edmonton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,409 against 8,360, larger than Bentley Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Edmonton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison