Beresfield vs Bibbenluke
Property investment comparison - Beresfield, NSW 2322 vs Bibbenluke, NSW 2632
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beresfield wins 2, Bibbenluke wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Beresfield | Bibbenluke |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $780K | $780K |
| Median unit price | $620K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.03% | 2.89% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.37% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +11.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.7% |
| Population | 3,267 | 82 |
Beresfield vs Bibbenluke: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Beresfield and $780K in Bibbenluke.
On cash flow, Beresfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.03%, compared with 2.89% in Bibbenluke, a gap of 1.14 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Beresfield and 1.7% in Bibbenluke, so landlords in Beresfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Beresfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,267 against 82, roughly 40 times the size of Bibbenluke; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Beresfield for rental income, Beresfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison