Skip to main content

Beresfield vs Windale

Property investment comparison - Beresfield, NSW 2322 vs Windale, NSW 2306

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beresfield wins 0, Windale wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeresfieldWindale
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price$620K$385K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.03%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.37%-
1-year house growth+11.7%estimate+16.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%0.0%
Population3,2673,421

Beresfield vs Windale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Beresfield and $780K in Windale.

For units, Beresfield sits at a median of $620K against $385K in Windale, which makes Windale the more affordable unit market and Beresfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Beresfield (an estimate) and +16.4% in Windale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Windale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.0% in Windale and 1.0% in Beresfield, so landlords in Windale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Windale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,421 against 3,267, larger than Beresfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Windale for recent price momentum, Windale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison