Berri vs Kybybolite
Property investment comparison - Berri, SA 5343 vs Kybybolite, SA 5262
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berri wins 2, Kybybolite wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Berri | Kybybolite |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $410K | $375K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.30% | 4.01% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.71% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +12.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +33.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 4.3% |
| Population | 4,143 | 102 |
Berri vs Kybybolite: what the numbers say
The median house price is $410K in Berri and $375K in Kybybolite, so Kybybolite is the cheaper entry point, with Berri houses about 9% dearer.
On cash flow, Berri leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.30%, compared with 4.01% in Kybybolite, a gap of 1.29 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Berri and 4.3% in Kybybolite, so landlords in Berri face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Berri is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,143 against 102, roughly 41 times the size of Kybybolite; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Berri for rental income, Kybybolite for a lower purchase price, Berri for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison