Berry Park vs Surfside
Property investment comparison - Berry Park, NSW 2321 vs Surfside, NSW 2536
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berry Park wins 1, Surfside wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Berry Park | Surfside |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $735K | $735K |
| Median unit price | $605K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.70% | 4.10% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.21% | 4.77% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +0.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +15.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 6.3% | 2.3% |
| Population | 182 | 1,456 |
Berry Park vs Surfside: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $735K in Berry Park and $735K in Surfside.
On cash flow, Berry Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 4.10% in Surfside, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Surfside and 6.3% in Berry Park, so landlords in Surfside face less competition for tenants.
Surfside is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,456 against 182, roughly 8 times the size of Berry Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Berry Park for rental income, Surfside for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison