Berry Park vs Weston
Property investment comparison - Berry Park, NSW 2321 vs Weston, NSW 2326
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berry Park wins 1, Weston wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Berry Park | Weston |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $735K | $735K |
| Median unit price | $605K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.70% | 4.05% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.21% | 4.33% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +17.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 6.3% | 0.8% |
| Population | 182 | 4,088 |
Berry Park vs Weston: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $735K in Berry Park and $735K in Weston.
On cash flow, Berry Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 4.05% in Weston, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Weston and 6.3% in Berry Park, so landlords in Weston face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Weston is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,088 against 182, roughly 22 times the size of Berry Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Berry Park for rental income, Weston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison