Skip to main content

Berserker vs Vincent

Property investment comparison - Berserker, QLD 4701 vs Vincent, QLD 4814

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Berserker wins 5, Vincent wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBerserkerVincent
Median house price$540K$550K
Median unit price$485K$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.10%4.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%5.19%
1-year house growth+18.6%+14.5%
3-year house growth+86.1%+81.7%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.5%
Population7,0202,213

Berserker vs Vincent: what the numbers say

The median house price is $540K in Berserker and $550K in Vincent, so Berserker is the cheaper entry point, with Vincent houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Berserker sits at a median of $485K against $510K in Vincent, which makes Berserker the more affordable unit market and Vincent the pricier one.

On cash flow, Berserker leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.10%, compared with 4.70% in Vincent, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.6% in Berserker and +14.5% in Vincent, so recent momentum favours Berserker, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Berserker houses are +86.1% and Vincent houses +81.7%, so Berserker has compounded faster than Vincent over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.5%.

Berserker is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,020 against 2,213, roughly 3.2 times the size of Vincent; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Berserker for rental income, Berserker for a lower purchase price, Berserker for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison