Skip to main content

Bethania vs Kewarra Beach

Property investment comparison - Bethania, QLD 4205 vs Kewarra Beach, QLD 4879

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bethania wins 2, Kewarra Beach wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBethaniaKewarra Beach
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price-$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.55%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.35%
1-year house growth+21.5%estimate+12.5%
3-year house growth-+35.9%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.5%
Population6,3336,133

Bethania vs Kewarra Beach: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Bethania and $900K in Kewarra Beach.

On cash flow, Kewarra Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 3.55% in Bethania, a gap of 0.95 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.5% in Bethania (an estimate) and +12.5% in Kewarra Beach, so recent momentum favours Bethania, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Bethania and 1.5% in Kewarra Beach, so landlords in Bethania face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bethania is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,333 against 6,133, larger than Kewarra Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kewarra Beach for rental income, Bethania for recent price momentum, Bethania for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison