Skip to main content

Bethania vs Nambour

Property investment comparison - Bethania, QLD 4205 vs Nambour, QLD 4560

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bethania wins 1, Nambour wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBethaniaNambour
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price-$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.55%4.01%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+21.5%estimate+12.8%
3-year house growth-+33.8%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.5%
Population6,33312,145

Bethania vs Nambour: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Bethania and $900K in Nambour.

On cash flow, Nambour leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.01%, compared with 3.55% in Bethania, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.5% in Bethania (an estimate) and +12.8% in Nambour, so recent momentum favours Bethania, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Nambour and 0.8% in Bethania, so landlords in Nambour face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nambour is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,145 against 6,333, larger than Bethania; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Nambour for rental income, Bethania for recent price momentum, Nambour for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison