Bethany vs Littlehampton
Property investment comparison - Bethany, SA 5352 vs Littlehampton, SA 5250
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bethany wins 2, Littlehampton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bethany | Littlehampton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1M | $970K |
| Median unit price | $415K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | 3.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.33% | 2.82% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +22.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.0% | 1.3% |
| Population | 146 | 3,300 |
Bethany vs Littlehampton: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1M in Bethany and $970K in Littlehampton, so Littlehampton is the cheaper entry point, with Bethany houses about 3% dearer.
On cash flow, Littlehampton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.30% in Bethany, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.0% in Bethany and 1.3% in Littlehampton, so landlords in Bethany face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Littlehampton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,300 against 146, roughly 23 times the size of Bethany; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Littlehampton for rental income, Littlehampton for a lower purchase price, Bethany for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison