Bethany vs Meadows
Property investment comparison - Bethany, SA 5352 vs Meadows, SA 5201
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bethany wins 1, Meadows wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bethany | Meadows |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1M | $1M |
| Median unit price | $415K | $325K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | 3.66% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.33% | 6.44% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +43.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.0% | 1.1% |
| Population | 146 | 1,717 |
Bethany vs Meadows: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Bethany and $1M in Meadows.
For units, Bethany sits at a median of $415K against $325K in Meadows, which makes Meadows the more affordable unit market and Bethany the pricier one.
On cash flow, Meadows leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.66%, compared with 3.30% in Bethany, a gap of 0.36 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.0% in Bethany and 1.1% in Meadows, so landlords in Bethany face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Meadows is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,717 against 146, roughly 12 times the size of Bethany; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Meadows for rental income, Bethany for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison